Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 84
Filter
1.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 65(4): e337-e343, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2289081

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The COVID-19 pandemic placed the issue of resource utilization front and center. Our comprehensive cancer center developed a Goals of Care Rapid Response Team (GOC RRT) to optimize resource utilization balanced with goal-concordant patient care. OBJECTIVES: Primary study objective was to evaluate feasibility of the GOC RRT by describing the frequency of consultations that occurred from those requested. Secondary objectives included adherence to consultation processes in terms of core team member participation and preliminary efficacy in limiting care escalation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients referred to GOC RRT (3/23/2020-9/30/2020). Analysis was descriptive. Categorical variables were compared with Fisher's exact or Chi-Square tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were referred. Eighty-five percent (76 of 89) underwent a total of 95 consultations. Median (range) patient age was 61 (49, 69) years, 54% (48 of 89) male, 19% (17 of 89) Hispanic, 48% (43/89) White, 73% (65 of 89) married/partnered and 66% (59 of 89) Christian. Hematologic malignancies and solid tumors were evenly balanced (53% [47/89] vs. 47% [42 of 89, P = 0.199]). Most patients (82%, 73 of 89) had metastatic disease or relapsed leukemia. Seven percent (6 of 89) had confirmed COVID-19. Sixty-nine percent (61 of 89) died during the index hospitalization. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic or clinical characteristics among groups (no consultation, 1 consultation, >1 consultation). Core team members were present at 64% (61 of 95) of consultations. Care limitation occurred in 74% (56 of 76) of patients. CONCLUSION: GOC RRT consultations were feasible and associated with care limitation. Adherence to core team participation was fair.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospital Rapid Response Team , Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/therapy , Patient Care Planning , Neoplasms/therapy , Decision Making
2.
Artif Intell Med ; 138: 102514, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257595

ABSTRACT

The onset of cancer disease is a traumatic experience for both patients and their families that suddenly change the patient's life and is accompanied by important physical, emotional, and psycho-social problems. The complexity of this scenario has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic which dramatically affected the continuity of the provision of optimal care to chronic patients. Telemedicine can support the management of oncology care paths by furnishing a suite of effective and efficient tools to monitor the therapies of cancer patients. In particular, this is a suitable setting for therapies that are administered at home. In this paper, we present an AI-based system, called Arianna, designed and implemented to support and monitor patients treated by the professionals belonging to the Breast Cancer Unit Network (BCU-Net) along the entire clinical path of breast cancer treatment. We describe in this work the three modules composing the Arianna system (the tools for patients and clinicians, and the symbolic AI-based module). The system has been validated in a qualitative way and we demonstrated how the Arianna solution reached a high level of acceptability by all types of end-users by making it suitable for a concrete integration into the daily practice of the BCU-Net.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Artificial Intelligence , Patient Care Planning
3.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(1): 13-19, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2205445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected the health sector, especially the speed of healthcare services in hospitals, such as nursing care. This is caused by the low ratio between the number of resources available and the number of cases handled, which leads to suboptimal services. One of the solutions to this problem is to implement a digital (mobile) nursing care information system. Therefore, this study aims to produce a digital (mobile) nursing information system model that is suitable for hospitals. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The research and development (RnD) method used in this study was carried out in three stages, namely, analysis of information system needs, preparation of the model design, and trial of Mobile Nursing Care Plan Information System (MNCPIS). The design was prepared with the Framework for Application of System Technique (FAST). A total of 148 nurses were selected as respondents using a simple random sampling approach. Data were then collected through interviews, focus group discussions, and questionnaires. Furthermore, MNCPIS was assessed with system requirements analysis using the Performance, Information, Economic, Control/Security, Efficiency, and Service (PIECES) framework. RESULTS: The t-test results indicate that MNCPIS was more effective and appropriate compared to the conventional (manual) types. This was indicated by all the variables measured in the MNCPIS component, including assessment, nursing diagnosis and evaluation, planning, and implementation. Based on these findings, the model can be developed as a nursing care information system to improve the quality assurance of services rendered by nurses. CONCLUSIONS: A mobile plan information system can be implemented in the nursing care department in hospitals to ensure satisfaction and quality assurance for the services provided in hospitals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nursing Services , Humans , Pandemics , Hospitals , Patient Care Planning
4.
Intern Med J ; 52(6): 935-943, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1874422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older frail patients are more likely to have timely goals of care (GOC) documentation than non-frail patients. AIMS: To investigate whether timely documentation of GOC within 72 h differed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020), compared with the pre-COVID-19 era (2019) for older frail patients. METHODS: Multi-site retrospective cohort study was conducted in two public hospitals where all consecutive frail adult patients aged ≥65 years were admitted under medical units for at least 24 h between 1 March 31 and October in 2019 and between 1 March and 31 October 2020 were included. The GOC was derived from electronic records. Frailty status was derived from hospital coding data using hospital frailty risk score (frail ≥5). The primary outcome was the documentation of GOC within 72 h of hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, rapid response call, intensive care unit admission, prolonged hospital length of stay (≥10 days) and time to the documentation of GOC. RESULTS: The study population comprised 2021 frail patients admitted in 2019 and 1849 admitted in 2020, aged 81.2 and 90.9 years respectively. The proportion of patients with timely GOC was lower in 2020, than 2019 (48.3% (893/1849) vs 54.9% (1109/2021); P = 0.021). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients in 2020 were less likely to receive timely GOC (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.88). Overall time to GOC documentation was longer in 2020 (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI 0.80-0.93). CONCLUSION: Timely GOC documentation occurred less frequently in frail patients during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the pre-COVID-19 era.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Documentation , Frail Elderly , Frailty/diagnosis , Frailty/epidemiology , Humans , Length of Stay , Pandemics , Patient Care Planning , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Palliat Med ; 25(2): 282-290, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1665856

ABSTRACT

Context/Objectives: It is paramount that clinicians assess and document patients' priorities to guide goal-concordant interventions, especially during a public health crisis. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Academic safety-net medical center in central Massachusetts, United States. Methods: We examined electronic medical records (EMRs) to discern goals-of-care (GOC) conversations with COVID-19 patients seen at some point by palliative care during their hospitalization, and all clinicians' use of a structured note template during the peak incidence of COVID-19 from March to May 2020. Patients were grouped based on comorbidities and preadmission living situation. GOC discussions were categorized into three types: code status decisions, other treatment decisions, and no treatment decisions. Results: Nearly all (97%) patients had GOC documentation within 48 hours of admission. Forty-four percent of first GOC conversations incorporated the template. Patients with dementia living in nursing facilities had GOC documentation within hours of hospital admission, whereas healthier patients had their first GOC conversation at one week of hospitalization. Decisions about code status predominated in the first (83%) and second (49%) discussions, followed by a focus on other treatment decisions in subsequent discussions (44%-57%). Many did not require a treatment decision (19%-27%) but focused on quality-of-life definitions. Nearly all survivors were discharged to a facility and only four patients returned home. Many survivors died within three months (case fatality rate: 77%). Conclusions: GOC documentation using a structured template combined with easy EMR retrievability and clinician training holds promise for aligning patients' values with real-time medical decisions, during and after the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Goals , Documentation , Humans , Patient Care Planning , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 8432856, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1622121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has made dentists very assiduous about cross-infection during dental treatment, thereby delaying dental radiographs for treatment. However, patients needing dental emergency treatment in the ongoing pandemic require relevant intra/extraoral dental radiography for adequate diagnosis and treatment planning. METHODS: This article is aimed at adding to the hot debate: Is delay for intraoral radiographs justified or a possible proxy? As a narrative review, it provides an insight into the reasons for delaying intra-oral dental radiographs during in the pandemic and options of the nontraditional radiographic techniques available until the pandemic subsides. Discussion and Conclusion. Cross-contamination concerns through respiratory droplets grow while using intraoral film holders that stimulate gag reflex, coughing, saliva secretion, and if proper disinfection protocols are not applied. Since the patients' acquiring emergency dental treatment cannot be neglected, the return-to-work guidelines by the health regulatory bodies urge to prioritize extraoral radiographic imaging techniques to curb the infection, offering the best diagnostic efficacy. The dental professionals can consider cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and sectional dental panoramic radiographs (SDPRs), followed by a risk assessment for COVID-19, a safer modality in reducing cross-contamination and assuring an innocuous environment for both patient and coworkers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Radiography, Dental/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Care Planning , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Radiography, Panoramic , Time-to-Treatment
10.
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi ; 23(3): 133-135, 2020 03 20.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1389585

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, China diagnosed the first patient with 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and the following development of the epidemic had a huge impact on China and the whole world. For patients with lung occupying lesions, the whole process of diagnosis and treatment can not be carried out as usual due to the epidemic. For thoracic surgeons, the timing of surgical intervention should be very carefully considered. All thoracic surgeons in China should work together to develop the proper procedures for the diagnosis and treatment in this special situation, and continuously update the recommendations based on epidemic changes and further understanding of COVID-19. Here, we only offer some preliminary suggestions based on our own knowledge for further reference and discussion.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Lung Diseases , Pneumonia, Viral , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Epidemics , Humans , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/surgery , Patient Care Planning , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Interface (Botucatu, Online) ; 25(supl.1): e200589, 2021. ilus
Article in Spanish | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-1332050

ABSTRACT

El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar los indicadores asociados al bienestar materno-infantil en los protocolos cubanos de actuación para la Covid-19. Con este fin, se realizó un análisis cualitativo de contenido que combinó una lógica deductiva derivada de la revisión bibliográfica de la literatura sobre bienestar materno-infantil y experiencia positiva del parto, y otra inductiva, con base en el procesamiento de la información empírica de los protocolos cubanos, según las recomendaciones de la OMS y la OPS. El análisis reveló que las guías enfatizan en la vida de la madre y el niño y priorizan la atención de las embarazadas como parte del acceso universal y gratuito a la salud; pero descuidan aspectos cualitativos del bienestar y la calidad del servicio, y con ello, los derechos de las gestantes y madres, y sus necesidades físicas, emocionales, psicológicas, sociales y espirituales. (AU)


O artigo tem como objetivo analisar os indicadores associados ao bem-estar materno-infantil nos protocolos de ação cubanos para o Covid-19. Por tanto, foi realizada uma análise de conteúdo qualitativa que combinou uma lógica dedutiva derivada da revisão bibliográfica da literatura sobre bem-estar materno-infantil e uma experiência positiva de parto, e uma indutiva, baseada no processamento de informações empíricas de protocolos cubanos, a luz das recomendações da OMS e da OPAS. A análise revelou que as orientações enfatizam a vida da mãe e do filho e priorizam o cuidado à gestante como parte do acesso universal e gratuito à saúde. Porém, negligenciam os aspectos qualitativos do bem-estar e da qualidade do serviço e, com isso, os direitos da gestante e da mãe, suas necessidades físicas, emocionais, psicológicas, sociais e espirituais. (AU)


The article aims to analyze indicators associated with maternal and child wellbeing in the Cuban Covid-19 action protocols. We carried out a qualitative content analysis that combined a deductive logic derived from a bibliographic review of the literature on maternal and child wellbeing and positive childbirth experiences, and an inductive logic based on the processing of empirical information from Cuban protocols, in light of the recommendations issued by WHO and PAHO. The analysis revealed that the instructions emphasize the mother's and child's life and prioritize care provided for pregnant women as part of free and universal access to health. However, they neglect the qualitative aspects of wellbeing and service quality and, with this, they also neglect the pregnant woman's and mother's rights, as well as their physical, emotional, psychological, social and spiritual needs. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Parturition/psychology , COVID-19 , Maternal Welfare , Patient Care Planning , Cuba
13.
Ann Fam Med ; 19(4): 365-367, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1311276

ABSTRACT

When the immediate threat of COVID-19 subsides, the future of health care will involve more virtual care. Before the pandemic, patient choice rather than clinician guidance determined which medium (telephone visits, video visits, electronic messaging) was used to receive care. Two media synchronicity theory principles-conveyance and convergence-can create a framework for determining how to choose the right medium of care for the patient. The author describes how it changed their practice and decision making with a patient story that required the use of multiple virtual care options.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communication , Telemedicine/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Child, Preschool , Cough/etiology , Dyspnea/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Office Visits , Patient Care Planning , Patient Preference , SARS-CoV-2 , Syphilis/diagnosis , Telephone , Text Messaging , Videoconferencing
14.
Cells ; 10(6)2021 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1259430

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) gave rise to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A strong correlation has been demonstrated between worse COVID-19 outcomes, aging, and metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is primarily derived from obesity-induced systemic chronic low-grade inflammation with numerous complications, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The majority of COVID-19 deaths occurs in people over the age of 65. Individuals with MetS are inclined to manifest adverse disease consequences and mortality from COVID-19. In this review, we examine the prevalence and molecular mechanisms underlying enhanced risk of COVID-19 in elderly people and individuals with MetS. Subsequently, we discuss current progresses in treating COVID-19, including the development of new COVID-19 vaccines and antivirals, towards goals to elaborate prophylactic and therapeutic treatment options in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/therapy , Chemoprevention/trends , Metabolic Syndrome/therapy , Aging/drug effects , Aging/immunology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Chemoprevention/methods , History, 21st Century , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Metabolic Syndrome/diagnosis , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Patient Care Planning/trends , Prevalence , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Vulnerable Populations
16.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 82(4): 1-6, 2021 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1207923

ABSTRACT

In view of the high morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19, early and honest conversations with patients about goals of care are vital. Advance care planning in its traditional manner may be difficult to achieve given the unpredictability of the disease trajectory. Despite this, it is crucial that patients' care wishes are explored as this will help prevent inappropriate admissions to hospital and to critical care, improve symptom control and advocate for patient choice. This article provides practical tips on how to translate decisions around treatment escalation plans into conversations, both face-to-face and over the phone, in a sensitive and compassionate manner. Care planning conversations for patients with COVID-19 should be individualised and actively involve the patient. Focusing on goals of care rather than ceilings of treatment can help to alleviate anxiety around these conversations and will remind patients that their care will never cease. Using a framework such as the 'SPIKES' mnemonic can help to structure this conversation. Verbally conveying empathy will be key, particularly when wearing personal protective equipment or speaking to relatives over the phone. It is also important to make time to recognise your own emotions during and/or after these conversations.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communication , Terminal Care/organization & administration , Advance Care Planning/standards , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/standards , Empathy , Humans , Patient Care Planning , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2 , Telephone , Terminal Care/standards
17.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 62(4): 691-698, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1164114

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Advance care planning (ACP) conversations represent an important physician skill, a need further highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most resident ACP training occurs in inpatient, settings, often featuring goals of care (GOC) conversations during a crisis. Outpatient clinics are valuable but underutilized settings to provide skills training for residents, yet little research has been done in these spaces. OBJECTIVE: We sought to 1) create an ACP curriculum harnessing the principles of a community of practice in a virtual format, and 2) obtain residents' perspectives regarding their skills and confidence in having early GOC conversations in the outpatient setting. METHODS: We interviewed 48 internal medicine residents using questionnaires, reflective narratives, and transcripts of debriefing conversations. We created a virtual curriculum during the ambulatory week which included didactics, virtual role plays, ACP phone conversations with five patients, and group debriefings. Quantitative data were analyzed for changes in resident confidence. Qualitative data were coded using thematic analysis, guided by instructor field notes. RESULTS: Residents reported decreased confidence in navigating advance directive conversations following training [Z=2.24, P=0.03, r = 0.33]. Resident reflections indicated that they felt more practiced at inpatient late GOC conversation skills, and that these skills were not fully transferable to the outpatient early GOC setting. Residents also endorsed the ambulatory environment as the best space for ACP conversations. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the feasibility of a virtual format for ACP curriculum. The virtual community of practice created space for a metacognitive unmasking of prior resident unconscious incompetence. Also, inpatient, crisis-oriented late GOC conversation skills may translate poorly to the outpatient setting requiring early and ongoing GOC skills. Residents need more training to navigate ACP conversations in ambulatory environments.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Telemedicine , Communication , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Care Planning , SARS-CoV-2
18.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 54(3): 349-358, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1157513

ABSTRACT

The radiology department was categorized as a "high risk area" during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003 and is similarly considered a "high risk area" during the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of infection control is to isolate patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 from uninfected people by utilizing separate equipment, spaces, and healthcare workers. Infection control measures should be prioritized to prevent the nosocomial spread of infection. We established a COVID-19 infection control team in our radiology department. The team's responsibilities include triaging patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, performing imaging and reporting, using dedicated equipment, disinfecting the equipment and the immediate environment, and staff scheduling.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Health Personnel , Humans , Patient Care/methods , Patient Care Planning , Patient Safety , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Program Evaluation
19.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 76(4): e225-e229, 2021 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1132499

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The current study aims to explore person-centered communication between health care professionals and COVID-19-infected older patients in acute care settings. METHODS: The current qualitative study explored the communication between professionals and COVID-19-infected older adults in the acute care setting through 2 rounds of interviews with physicians and nurses who provided direct care and treatment for COVID-19-infected older patients in Wuhan, China. We explored the possibilities and significance of facilitating effective communication despite multiple challenges in the pandemic. Conventional content analysis was adopted to analyze the rich data collected from our participants. RESULTS: It is possible and necessary to initiate and sustain person-centered communication despite multiple challenges brought by the pandemic. The achievement of person-centered communication can play significant roles in addressing challenges, building mutual trust, improving quality of care and relationships, and promoting treatment adherence and patients' psychological well-being. DISCUSSION: It is challenging for health care professionals to provide care for COVID-19-infected older adults, especially for those with cognitive and sensory impairment, in acute care settings. Facilitating person-centered communication is a significant strategy in responding to the pandemic crisis and a core element of person-centered care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Professional-Patient Relations , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , China , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Personhood , Qualitative Research
20.
J Perioper Pract ; 31(4): 147-152, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1125675

ABSTRACT

The effect of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic on the National Health Service in the United Kingdom has been profound and unprecedented with suspension of most elective surgeries. As we are emerging from lockdown now, restarting elective surgical procedures in a safe and effective manner is an expected challenge. Many perioperative factors including patient prioritisation, risk assessment, health infrastructure and infection prevention strategies need to be considered for patient safety. The British Orthopaedic Association, along with the National Health Service, have provided recent guidelines for restarting non-urgent and orthopaedic care in the United Kingdom. In this article we review the current guidelines and literature to provide some clarity for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Elective Surgical Procedures/nursing , Orthopedic Procedures/nursing , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Perioperative Care/nursing , Recovery of Function , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Patient Safety , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Assessment , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL